Tandon, Rajesh2025-09-292025-09-291979https://knowledgedemocracydspace.com/handle/123456789/862African regional workshop on participatory research, Institute of Development Management, Mzumba, Morogoro, Tanzania, July 1-7, 1979In this paper, Rajesh Tandon responds to a critique of a paper on the methodology of the participatory research approach, presented at the African Regional Workshop on Participatory Research in Tanzania in 1979. A central fallacy runs through the original argument that the wide range of political activism within PRA produces naive idealism and methodological adhocism. Participatory research is not an invention of the seventies; only its label is new, since people organising the rural poor had long practised its elements without naming them. Two vantage points inform the approach, the activist's and the professional researchers, and reconciling them forms the real challenge. Classical research confines inquiry to thinking alone, while PRA treats feeling and acting as equally valid modes of knowing. A genuine risk of subjective, superficial analysis remains, addressed through joint analysis between researcher and people. PRA's apparent anarchism reflects unfamiliarity and variety rather than incoherence.enParticipatory ResearchParticipatory Action ResearchCo-Construction of KnowledgeSDG 17: Partnerships for the GoalsIndiaOther