Decolonised Knowledge

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://knowledgedemocracydspace.com/handle/123456789/1070

Browse

Start date: 1980End date: 1989

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 7 of 7
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The democratization of research in adult and non-formal education
    (John Wiley & Sons, 1981) Hall, Budd L
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Creating knowledge: A monopoly? Participatory research in development
    (Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), 1982-06) Hall, Budd L; Gillete, Arthur; Tandon, Rajesh
    This book is about participatory research as a political process bound up with questions of power and knowledge production, rather than merely a set of methods. It opens with the Jamaican Drama for Progress literacy project, where a shift from delivering pre-written messages to villagers toward enabling them to write and perform their own material captures the move from research done on people to research done with them. Drawing on the Latin American tradition of investigación acción and Paulo Freire's thematic investigation, the collection questions who is authorised to produce knowledge about poverty and underdevelopment. Five theoretical essays address participation, power and alternative methods, followed by seven case studies from Indonesia, Senegal, Tanzania, England, Chile, Canada and India, and a concluding section of critical reactions. Rather than success stories, what emerges are unresolved questions about initiating participatory work, sustaining ties with political organisations, and balancing theory with praxis in research committed to social transformation.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    The democratization of the production of knowledge
    (1988-05-03) Hall, Budd L
    Dr. Budd L. Hall delivered the opening address at a participatory research workshop held at the University of Calgary in May 1988. In this address, he reflects on his journey in participatory research, beginning with his work in Tanzania in the early 1970s, where he met Paulo Freire, to his role in founding the International Participatory Research Network in 1977. By the time of the address, he headed the International Council for Adult Education. . Participatory research is framed through three connected dimensions: a theoretical grounding aimed at building popular hegemony rather than serving ruling classes, an epistemological understanding of knowledge formed through the interaction of research, education and action, and a political practice built on working directly with communities. Feminist, Indigenous, and worker perspectives run through the address, including a Montreal poultry workers' union that studied its own workplace health conditions instead of relying on outside experts, illustrating that there are many ways of knowing beyond formal Western science. John Gaventa's observation appears too that social movements often falter either by rejecting research altogether or by depending too heavily on outside experts. A six-step method developed by Joao Francisco de Souza runs from context and justification through to the collectivization of the knowledge produced. Participatory research is presented, in the end, as a difficult but necessary strategy within the larger struggle over who controls knowledge and power
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Zapatistas in Chiapas
    (1984-03-23) Tandon, Rajesh
    At a moment when Mexico was entering a new era of economic liberalisation under NAFTA, an unexpected uprising in Chiapas reshaped debates on democracy, land, and indigenous rights. This paper examines the Zapatista movement within the longer history of indigenous struggle while drawing attention to its distinctive way of combining traditional claims with new tools of communication and solidarity. The research also considers how the movement’s vision travelled beyond Chiapas, raising questions about development, autonomy, and cultural survival. In doing so, it argues for seeing the Zapatistas not only as a regional rebellion but as a reminder that struggles over dignity and self-determination can unsettle dominant ideas of governance in ways that remain unresolved.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Education for all as determined by the few?
    (Society for Participatory Research in Asia, 1989-12) Tandon, Rajesh
    The text talks about the World Conference on ‘Education For All’ world charter, and the subsequent issues raised by educationalists while examining their documents. The text examines eleven such issues. First, the narrow economistic and utilitarian view of education focused on human capital formation rather than a humanistic vision. Second, education is portrayed as adaptative and socializing rather than transformative and liberating. Third, ignorance being equated with illiteracy, ignoring the knowledge and wisdom of non-literate people and the destruction caused by the literates. Fourth, the documents treat Education For All as a techno managerial problem rather than recognizing it as a fundamentally political decision requiring political will. Fifth, disparities in education are presented as the reason for underdevelopment, ignoring that educational disparities are rooted in socio-economic and political inequalities. Sixth, gender justice receives only superficial attention despite women constituting 70% of those denied education. Seventh, other marginalized groups like the tribals, scheduled castes, the poor, minorities are also largely ignored. Eighth, literacy is underplayed despite being central to Education For All. Ninth, the process is highly centralized, excluding the common people whose learning needs are to be met. Tenth, resource mobilization discussions fail to address debt burdens and defense expenditures that divert resources from education. Finally, the whole process and language of the documents risks new forms of colonization, with educational agendas determined mainly by donors and experts from the North. The paper concludes by calling for this initiative to be critiqued, discussed, and debated to ensure that Education For All becomes a genuine concern of all people.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Participatory research-Popular knowledge and power
    (1984-09) Hall, Budd L
    This article includes two chapters about the concepts of knowledge and creation of a monopoly over social science research along with offering an alternative in the form of participatory research. The first chapter discusses knowledge within the context of economic failure and the role of universities in the new international order. It talks about the commodification of knowledge which has facilitated capitalist dependency and an uneven development in third world countries. It further discusses the monopoly created over knowledge by a small group of elites to serve their own interests. Indigenous education around the world appears to be absent from the universal body of knowledge. The paper then discusses in detail about how research and social scientists are being used by institutions to impose bureaucratic and ideological control. It criticises the traditional research methods and opens discussion on an alternative methodology, in the form of participatory research. The next chapter further explores the concept of participatory research, its origin, and its characteristics. It talks about the importance of popular forms of knowledge and how it is linked with social transformation. It emphasizes the need for participatory research processes to be working within the frameworks of social movements. The chapter concludes with presenting some points to shape the future of participatory research.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Creating knowledge: Breaking the monopoly
    (1982) Hall, Budd L
    This article by Dr Budd Hall talks about the role of education and research in shaping the development sector from urban centered growth to improving the rural areas. It talks about how the forms of research in social sciences have developed with the need to be convenient to administrators and policy makers. It mentions survey approach being a common research method and explains its weaknesses. Participatory research is then presented as an alternative methodology that directly includes the beneficiaries of the research in collection and interpretation of the data. The article presents a case study from Tanzania where participatory method was used in response to the issue of food spoilage after a good harvest. It concludes by urging educators and researchers to constantly evaluate political implications of their work.