Participatory Action Research
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://knowledgedemocracydspace.com/handle/123456789/1074
Browse
10 results
Search Results
Item Workshop report teaching of participatory research, 4-5 August 2005(2005-08) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)Item Second national inter professional dialogue on participaroty development and participatory research, April 18-24, 1997(Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA) and Association of Schools of Social Work in India (ASSWI), 1997-04) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)The Second National Inter-Professional Dialogue on Participatory Development and Participatory Research took place at PRIA, New Delhi, from April 18-24, 1997, organised in part the Association of Schools of Social Work in India. Eighteen social work teachers from across the country attended as a residential cohort alongside senior practitioners and researchers serving as resource persons. The programme built upon a dialogue held in 1995 and aimed to develop conceptual clarity on participatory research and development while working out their implications for social work education. The sessions traced the history of development approaches and social work education in India, examined participatory research's evolution since the 1970s, and compared it with conventional social work research. Speakers including Rajesh Tandon, T K Oommen, Binoy Acharya, Sheela Patel, and Joe Madiath addressed governance, urban and rural participation, and global donor policy. A field visit to Panchayati Raj sites in Haryana grounded these discussions in practice. Three PRIA-funded research projects were presented and analysed. Closing group work produced consolidated reports on curriculum reform and issue-specific action plans drawn from the week's case studies.Item Participatory training: Philosophy and perspective(0000) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)The paper examines the assumptions underlying participatory training as a response to systems of inequality that concentrate power and control over the minds of ordinary people. Education, media and institutional knowledge production have historically devalued popular knowledge and eroded the self-confidence of ordinary people to think, act and transform their own realities. The paper proposes a set of guiding beliefs, termed articles of faith, centred on the capacity of ordinary people to learn, change and grow, as the basis for translating these ideas into practice. Conditions required for this translation include respecting learners and their experience, creating structured opportunities for sharing and critical reflection, strengthening self-esteem, and establishing mutuality between learner and trainer within a learner-centred and learner-controlled process. Training is presented as an ongoing, long-term intervention rather than an isolated event, directed toward generating new knowledge and countering hegemonic control. The paper closes by stating that trainers must first clarify their own assessment of reality, their vision of a better world, and their guiding articles of faith before designing training programmes.Item Participatory Research Network in Asia(1980) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)Item Participatory research: An introduction(Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), 1982) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)This book is about participatory research, put together by the Participatory Research Network and published in 1982 by the Society for Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA). It frames participatory research as three processes that cannot really be separated in practice, collective investigation, and collective analysis and action. Its roots draw from several places at once- adult education, anthropology, action research, and Paulo Freire's idea of conscientization. A large section covers methods used in the field, group discussions, public meetings, open-ended surveys, community seminars, popular theatre, and educational camps, grounded in real examples such as grain storage in Tanzania, a women's cooperative in South Korea, and sewage problems on a Canadian reserve. Four longer case studies follow, from Appalachia, Tanzania, Chile, and India, each raising doubts about whether the approach can move beyond reform or truly shift control to local people. The book closes with unresolved tensions around funding and training, and a set of poems that place the work within a wider international struggle.Item Revitalizing the teaching of participatory research in social sciences(Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), 2005-03) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)The report is based on several years of PRIA's experiences of working together with academic institutions. It began in 1994 with PRIA's collaboration with Association of Schools of Social Work in India (ASSWI). A series of inter- professional dialogues at national and regional level were organized to provide opportunities for social work educators, renowned academicians and experienced practitioners of participatory development (PD) and participatory research (PR) to come on a common platform and assess implications of the concepts in social work education and practice. Building on the lessons of the five-year collaboration (1994-1999), PRIA and ASSWI initiated a new phase of joint collaborative intervention in the year 2000 for strengthening the ideas of participation, democratic governance and citizenship. The need for the same was felt as the issues of democratic governance and citizenship gained significance in development debates and interventions. To effectively plan and implement this intervention, a strategy to strengthen five social work education institutions as Regional Nodal Centres (RNCs) was mutually agreed by PRIA and ASSWI. Institutions Identified to Work as RNCS were: Stella Maris Collage of social Work, Chenai; College of Social Work, Nirmala Niketan, Mumbai; Department of Social Work, Andhra University, Visakhapatnem; School of Social work, Lucknow University, Lucknow; Department of Social Work, Viswa-Bharati, Santiniketan. Besides working with ASSWI, PRIA also carried out a collaborative project with Jamia Milia Islamia, Delhi to help the faculties and students get conceptual orientation and field exposure in PR. An outcome of this intervention was introduction of the course on Participatory Sociology at postgraduate level. With PRIA's new strategic plan Governance Where People Matter "coming into operation in 2003, the academic Linkage porgrame has made concerted effort to reach out to social science faculties in Indian universities. During this period we hosted seminars in universities (Mysore University, Mysore; Osmania University, Hyderabad; Punjab University, Chandigarh) on participatory research and conducted an exhaustive mapping exercise of the teaching of PR in academic institutions. This synthesis report draws from 1) Earlier experiences and lessons gathered from working with ASSWI and Jamia Milia; 2) Discussions during seminars and lectures; 3) Independent discussion with social science faculty members in various universities; 4) Results of mapping of PR teaching; 5) Key note address given by Dr. RajeshTandon on "Should Participatory Research be Taught in a University?" (23 September 2003, Mysore University, Mysore) and key note address given by Dr. Ranjita Mohanty on "Participatory Research and the Agenda of Social Transformation" (29 August 2003, Punjab University, Chandigarh)Item Citizen's report on water supply, sanitation and solid waste management in selected small and medium towns in India(Society for Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), 2008-12) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)Strengthening citizen participation in urban governance has been one of the main objectives of PRIA. A variety of interventions towards the formation and strengthening of citizen collectives for effective participatory governance have been carried out in multiple locations of various small and medium towns. Study on ‘Citizen Report on Water Supply and Sanitation Services’ is one of the important initiatives undertaken by PRIA. The objectives of the intervention were two fold: (i) enhancing civic engagement and citizen participation and (ii) improving service delivery by the municipalities through enhanced accountability and participation. The specific objective was to assess the status of water supply and sanitation in terms of availability, accessibility, quantity, quality and affordability by involving citizen leaders/volunteers and local civil society actors so as to initiate a citizen monitoring system. The study is confined to eight cities namely, Dharamshala (Himachal Pradesh), Narnaul and Mahendergarh (Haryana), Rajnandgaon and Janjgir (Chhattisgarh), Jhunjhunu and Karauli (Rajasthan) and Sehore (Madhya Pradesh). Information on water supply and sanitation had been collected through a series of primary household surveys using a structured questionnaire. The approach was to involve active citizen volunteers/leaders in collecting data wherever they were present. Youth from local colleges and senior secondary schools were especially encouraged to participate in carrying out the interview surveys.Item Inter-Professional dialogue on participatory research and participatory development, April 19-25, 1995(PRIA and ASSWI, 1995-04-19) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA); ASSWIThis report is about a six-day residential dialogue held at PRIA, New Delhi, from April 19 to 25, 1995, bringing together twenty-one social work teachers from sixteen institutions across India. It was organised jointly by PRIA and the Association of Schools of Social Work in India, and the programme traced development thinking in India from colonial resource extraction through the green revolution to the emergence of civil society as a third actor alongside state and market. Sessions moved between conceptual grounding and field testimony, with contributions on urban slum work, panchayati raj, tribal displacement, unorganised labour, women's migration and sustainable development sitting alongside sharper debate on whether social work had earned a distinct professional identity or remained tied to a semi-professional, service-delivery role. Group work threaded through each day, pushing participants toward naming obstacles to participation and imagining how participatory research might enter curricula rather than stay confined to fieldwork electives. The closing sessions turned toward future collaboration between PRIA and the schools of social work.Item International perspectives on participatory monitoring and evaluation(Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), 2009-11-25) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)This paper developed by PRIA presents international perspectives on participatory monitoring and evaluation, examining its origin, and analysing the principles, methods, and practices that define it. The historical roots of Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation are traced to the emergence of participatory research which was influenced by practices of adult educators, and critiqued traditional social science methodologies that devalued popular knowledge and perpetuated elite control over knowledge production. The paper contrasts conventional forms of monitoring and evaluation with participatory forms and discusses the objectives and principles of Participatory M&E. It also outlines core steps in developing Participatory monitoring and evaluation, from identifying stakeholders to collecting information, analysis, and using results, and examines some objectives of innovative participatory techniques. Further, four case studies are used to illustrate participatory monitoring and evaluation in practice. The paper concludes by asking some important questions for proper establishment of participatory monitoring processes such as what information is needed, who will collect it, how it will be collected, and how findings will be used.Item Proposal for the study of participatory research, evaluation and training efforts in India(PRIA, 0000) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)This proposal outlines a study to document, analyze, and synthesize participatory processes in research, evaluation, and training across diverse settings in India. It highlights the shift in development strategies toward bottom-up, participatory approaches emphasizing empowerment, organizational building, and integration of popular knowledge. The study aims to fill gaps in documentation and provide accessible insights to grassroots activists and professionals. The methodology includes selecting case studies, engaging with stakeholders, and conducting field observations and workshops to generate actionable findings. Key questions include exploring control dynamics, knowledge creation, praxis, and empowerment in participatory processes. The study aims to produce a final report in multiple languages for wide dissemination.