Action for What ? A Critique of Evaluative Research
No Thumbnail Available
Date
0000
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
This document critiques evaluative research in the context of planned social change, exploring its objectives, methodologies, and implications. Evaluative research aims to measure the effectiveness of service and action programs, emphasizing objectives like the desirability of change, the ability to measure it, and the application of scientific methods to intervention programs. The discussion distinguishes between demonstration and operational programs, emphasizing the need for tailored evaluation designs, prototype testing, and continuous service improvement. The critique also addresses challenges in evaluator-program staff collaboration, advocating for participatory approaches in setting goals and implementing recommendations to enhance evaluation utilization.
Description
This critique delves into the foundational principles of evaluative research, its dual role in testing the validity of approaches and assessing operational feasibility, and its application in both demonstration and operational programs. The document underscores the significance of achieving consensus among evaluators and program staff for effective evaluation and program enhancement.
Keywords
Evaluative Research, Social Change, Program Evaluation, Intervention, Measurement of Effectiveness, Demonstration Programs, Operational Programs, Feedback Mechanisms