Understanding Participation

No Thumbnail Available

Date

0000

Authors

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

While it is impossible to pinpoint changes in development thinking with any historical accuracy, there is no doubt that the mid-1970s saw the start of a fundamental shift away from the domination of the modernisation paradigm of development thinking and intervention and a move towards a systematic search for alternatives. The past 15 years have witnessed a searching re-examination of the nature and purpose of development, and this re-examination has correspondingly influenced practice. The literature which has recorded this re-examination is prodigious, and many academics have immersed themselves in the new theoretical and conceptual horizons that have been provided. The re-examination threw up a whole new form of analysis dependency theory -that has steadily influenced the different dimensions of development intervention. The work of Haque and his colleagues (1977) was instrumental in giving structure to this re-thinking and their efforts have been built upon by successive researchers (Pearse and Stiefel, 1979; Galjart, 1981; Bhasin, 1985; Verhagen, 1985).

Description

the historical shift in development thinking from top-down modernization to participatory, people-centered approaches since the 1970s. It critiques capital-centered development for marginalizing rural populations and emphasizes the necessity of local participation. Structural, administrative, and social obstacles—such as centralized governance, legal exclusions, and ingrained dependency—are highlighted as key barriers. Genuine participation is presented as essential to achieving equitable and effective development outcomes.

Keywords

Dependency Mentality, Participatory Development, Modernization Paradigm, Administrative Centralization, Social Differentiation

Citation

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By