Lesson Learning, Monitoring, Impact Assessment and Evaluation

Simple item page
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-15T12:24:12Z
dc.date.available2025-04-15T12:24:12Z
dc.date.issued1996-03
dc.descriptionThis paper summarizes UPO’s 1996 efforts to improve project monitoring and impact assessment. It highlights key initiatives in cities like Calcutta and Cochin, and outlines coordination mechanisms between state departments and municipal bodies to enhance service delivery and policy alignment.
dc.description.abstractThis paper outlines UPO aims and achievements in 1996 to improve its own (and other stakeholders') ability to learn about the performance and impact of the projects. Marginal improvements in systematic routine monitoring are evident from this year's project reports; more significant initiatives have been taken to assess outputs and impact (the IAS of three SIPs, Calcutta SIP PALM studies, participatory committees in Chinagadili, and initial work in Cochin). On the basis of this work, key lessons are listed.
dc.identifier.urihttp://192.9.200.215:4000/handle/123456789/403
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectMunicipal Governance
dc.subjectImpact Assessment
dc.subjectUrban Planning
dc.subjectRoutine Monitoring
dc.subjectInfrastructure Services
dc.titleLesson Learning, Monitoring, Impact Assessment and Evaluation
dc.typeWorking Paper

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
Upo ASR March 1996 Position Paper First Draf 11.1.97 for team WORKSHOP 2 10-11 FEB.pdf
Size:
291.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Publications