Dialogue Across Difference?

No Thumbnail Available

Date

1997

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

This paper, presented at the 4th World Congress on Action Research, Action Learning, and Process Management, explores the evolution of participatory and action-oriented research methods. The author reflects on the journey from conventional social science to more participatory, dialogue-centered methodologies. It focuses on the importance of dialogue as a tool for mutual knowledge construction, especially in contexts marked by power imbalances and diverse cultural experiences. Case studies in psychiatric services evaluation and social services are discussed to illustrate the potential of dialogue across differences in fostering understanding, trust, and systemic change.

Description

The paper delves into the development of participatory research methods, highlighting a shift from conventional positivist approaches to more inclusive and dialogic methodologies. Drawing on experiences with various communities, particularly in human services and mental health contexts, the paper emphasizes the role of dialogue in transforming power dynamics, improving communication, and facilitating social change. The author also discusses the challenges and successes of integrating dialogue into complex systems, such as psychiatric services, where power imbalances often hinder collaboration. The paper concludes with insights on how dialogue can bridge divides and contribute to both personal and social healing in a range of service contexts.

Keywords

Action Research, Participatory Action Research, Dialogue, Social Emancipation, Intercultural Learning, Human Services, Knowledge Construction, Systems Theory, Organisational Learning

Citation

Wadsworth, Y. (1997). Dialogue Across Difference? Paper presented at the 4th World Congress on Action Research, Action Learning, and Process Management (ALARPM) and 8th World Congress on Participatory Action Research (PAR), Cartagena, Colombia.

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By