ASPBAE and Its Structure: Some Thoughts

dc.contributor.authorTandon, Rajesh
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-20T09:21:11Z
dc.date.available2025-05-20T09:21:11Z
dc.date.issued1987-12-01
dc.descriptionASPBAE’s decentralization to sub-regions has improved local control but risks weakening overall regional unity and cooperation. Balancing sub-regional autonomy with centralized flexibility under the Secretary-General is essential. New constitutional features aim to strengthen cross-regional coordination while preserving ASPBAE’s regional identity.
dc.description.abstractThe thrust of the decisions taken last year was to decentralise both programming and management (including financial) activities within each of the four sub-regions of ASPBAE. Decisions were also taken to send to each sub-region directly funds on the basis of proposed programmes for the year. I am sure that other members who have directly handled the responsibility of programming and management at the sub-region level may be in a better position to indicate their experiences during the year. But my sense is that this attempt at decentralisation may perhaps lead to substantial and systematic separation and segregation of sub-regions from each other and weaken the purposes and identity of ASPBAE as a whole.
dc.identifier.citationTandon, Rajesh. (1987). ASPBAE and Its Structure: Some Thoughts.
dc.identifier.urihttp://192.9.200.215:4000/handle/123456789/781
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectDecentralization
dc.subjectRegional Identity
dc.subjectCommunication & Cooperation
dc.subjectASPBAE programmes
dc.subjectManagement
dc.titleASPBAE and Its Structure: Some Thoughts
dc.typeOther

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
ASPBAE and its structure some thoughts.pdf
Size:
1.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed to upon submission
Description:

Collections