Knowledge Democracy
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://knowledgedemocracydspace.com/handle/123456789/1076
Browse
10 results
Search Results
Item Participatory research as a methodology of development(Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), 0000) Tandon, RajeshThis paper questions how development research has usually been done. It points out that classical research keeps a firm line between the researcher and the people being studied, treats the researcher's own values as something to be kept out of the picture, and leaves control of the whole process in the researcher's hands alone. Participatory research is put forward as a way of working that sets these assumptions aside. Here the problem to be studied comes from the community itself, the people affected take an active part in the inquiry, and the researcher works alongside them rather than above them. Three examples from India carry the idea forward. In West Bengal, sharecroppers were registered through village camps under what became known as Operation Barga. In southern Rajasthan, twelve tribal families built a shared irrigation system by reviving an old local practice of water-sharing. In Maharashtra, an organisation called Shramik Sanghatana brought together landless labourers and tribal women around wages, land rights and the effects of alcoholism on their households. Through these cases, the paper highlights some of the more challenging issues that participatory research raises, such as its closeness to political action, the difficulty of applying it in unorganized communities, and the need for a researcher's personal perspective before people are willing to trust the process.Item Creating knowledge: A monopoly? Participatory research in development(Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), 1982-06) Hall, Budd L; Gillete, Arthur; Tandon, RajeshThis book is about participatory research as a political process bound up with questions of power and knowledge production, rather than merely a set of methods. It opens with the Jamaican Drama for Progress literacy project, where a shift from delivering pre-written messages to villagers toward enabling them to write and perform their own material captures the move from research done on people to research done with them. Drawing on the Latin American tradition of investigación acción and Paulo Freire's thematic investigation, the collection questions who is authorised to produce knowledge about poverty and underdevelopment. Five theoretical essays address participation, power and alternative methods, followed by seven case studies from Indonesia, Senegal, Tanzania, England, Chile, Canada and India, and a concluding section of critical reactions. Rather than success stories, what emerges are unresolved questions about initiating participatory work, sustaining ties with political organisations, and balancing theory with praxis in research committed to social transformation.Item The democratization of the production of knowledge(1988-05-03) Hall, Budd LDr. Budd L. Hall delivered the opening address at a participatory research workshop held at the University of Calgary in May 1988. In this address, he reflects on his journey in participatory research, beginning with his work in Tanzania in the early 1970s, where he met Paulo Freire, to his role in founding the International Participatory Research Network in 1977. By the time of the address, he headed the International Council for Adult Education. . Participatory research is framed through three connected dimensions: a theoretical grounding aimed at building popular hegemony rather than serving ruling classes, an epistemological understanding of knowledge formed through the interaction of research, education and action, and a political practice built on working directly with communities. Feminist, Indigenous, and worker perspectives run through the address, including a Montreal poultry workers' union that studied its own workplace health conditions instead of relying on outside experts, illustrating that there are many ways of knowing beyond formal Western science. John Gaventa's observation appears too that social movements often falter either by rejecting research altogether or by depending too heavily on outside experts. A six-step method developed by Joao Francisco de Souza runs from context and justification through to the collectivization of the knowledge produced. Participatory research is presented, in the end, as a difficult but necessary strategy within the larger struggle over who controls knowledge and powerItem Participatory evaluation: Issues and concerns(Society for Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), 1989) Choudhary, Anil; Tandan, RajeshEvaluation has become a commonplace word and practice in development programmes throughout the world. Not only are programmes, plans and activities being designed and implemented to promote development in education, health, agriculture, etc. but they are also being evaluated regularly and frequently. There has also evolved, over the last couple of decades, specialized expertise, institutions and a body of knowledge in support of evaluation. However, much of this evaluation practice and theory continues to be utilized in a manner that is very similar to top-down models of development, which are currently being replaced by bottom-up strategies. In the course of our work with grass-roots organizations and non-governmental initiatives in India, and other countries of Asia, we have evolved, through our own practice, some ideas, principles and theory about Participatory Evaluation. We evolved these principles not only based on the critique of traditional evaluation approach but also based on what seemed relevant and appropriate in a given concrete situation. In our interactions with other practitioners, we have found multiple and varied meanings being given to the concept of Participatory Evaluation. For some, Participatory Evaluation implies the process of action-reflection-action. In the process of conscientizing and organizing the poor, several grass-roots activists and organizations have evolved a methodology of action-reflection-action. It is this process which is equated with the meaning of Participatory Evaluation by some. On the other hand, we have been calling our involvement in facilitating evaluation and analysis of a programme, an organization or a perspective as Participatory Evaluation.Item Participatory research and participatory social action(1980-04-13) Tandon, RajeshItem Participatory Evaluation and Research: Main Concepts and Issues(Indian Social Institute, 1981) Tandon, RajeshFrom the days in the 1930s when the University of Bombay first introduced a post-graduate course in sociology, to our days, there has been a gradual change to the professionalization of the social sciences. With professionalization came specialisation and its acceptance as a science that can be considered objective by creating a distance between the researcher and the 'object' of study i.e., the people studied—actors in the social setting.Item Knowledge as power: Participatory research as alternative(Indian Social Institute, 1985) Tandon, RajeshThis paper by Dr. Rajesh Tandon revolves around the concept of knowledge as a source of power and how participatory research has emerged as a solution against the monopoly of knowledge. The article argues that a major, yet subtle source of exploitation of people has emerged since World War II, through control exercised using knowledge. It explains how the professionalization of knowledge production has devalued ancient, popular knowledge and denied ordinary people access to professionally produced knowledge, leading the weaker sections of society to become even weaker. The article further presents participatory research as an alternative to help the weaker sections engage in knowledge production and its utilisation. A few key elements of participatory research it expands on are- recognizing and valuing existing popular knowledge, building new knowledge from authentic elements of existing knowledge, enabling ordinary people to exercise control of knowledge production and dissemination- promoting collective analysis and responsibility. This creates informed opinions, and enables concrete actions to transform the situation of the have-nots. The article concludes by providing examples of local organisations in India that have undertaken this process and emphasizes the need to promote popular knowledge and research that can function as a tool of collective action in favour of the minority.Item Creating knowledge: Breaking the monopoly(1982) Hall, Budd LItem Research, commitment, and action: The role of participatory research(International Review of Education, 1984) Hall, Budd LThe author discusses the development and practice of participatory research as both a method and strategy of social investigation and social action within an adult education framework. Participatory research is compared with traditional research strategies, and its defining principles are outlined, together with specific examples of its application and practical issues both today and in the future.Item Participatory evaluation of the M. Puthur rural expansion project of national Y.W.C.A.(Society for Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA) , 1986-08) Manilal V.The evaluation is participatory, and it was carried out for the Rural Expansion Project of the National Y.W.C.A in Thottiyam, Tiruchirapalli district, Tamil Nadu. The project’s main goals were related to adult education, development of village-based organizations and local leadership, women’s emancipation, youth activism, and economic development. The assessment revealed that adult education centers play an essential role in the growth of leadership and village-based organizations, as well as the power of women in the community. For instance, Mahila Mandals and Youth Clubs were formed in many villages, but the level of their development varies significantly. Moreover, the project facilitated access to government developmental schemes and loans, and it helped animate the staff and the village animators. The findings also indicated weaknesses related to group organization, collective action, staff coordination, and the transition from government dependence to self-sustaining. The evaluation recommended developing the staff’s and animators’ conceptual and practical knowledge of group organization and action, getting involved in the development of the village-based organizations, and working on time-bounded strategies for their progressive sustainability.