Participatory Action Research

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://knowledgedemocracydspace.com/handle/123456789/1074

Browse

Filters

2000 - 2009182010 - 20198

Settings

Start date: 2000End date: 2019

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 26
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Participatory impact assessment. August 20- 25, 2001
    (Particiaptory Research in Asia (PRIA), 2001-08-25) Dwivedi, Anju
    How can development interventions be made more accountable to the people they are meant to serve? In this paper, Anju Dwivedi examines how participatory impact assessment can reframe conventional approaches to evaluation by placing communities at the center of the process. She begins by tracing shifts in development thinking from a focus on economic growth in the 1950s to an increasing emphasis on participation and human development by the 1990s, where people’s involvement became central. Dwivedi argues that social development is not a linear process that can be captured through simple output and outcome measures. Impact must instead be understood as change from a given starting point, including intended and unintended effects on people’s lives. Participatory impact assessment therefore becomes a continuous process across the project cycle, engaging communities and other stakeholders in defining indicators, collecting data, and interpreting findings. The paper also foregrounds the importance of integrating a gender lens to understand differentiated impacts. For practitioners and researchers, this paper offers a grounded way to rethink impact assessment as a political and learning process rather than a technical exercise.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Social development monitoring: A process to ensure accountability
    (Prashasnika A Journal of Administrative Processes, 2006-12) Dwivedi, Anju
    What does it mean to monitor development processes, and who holds the power to do so? In this paper, Anju Dwivedi situates social development monitoring within the broader shift toward people centred development that emerged in the 1990s, where participation became central to planning and implementation. Instead of viewing monitoring as a technical exercise carried out by experts, the paper argues for a process rooted in community participation, where citizens continuously observe, question, and engage with development interventions. Social development monitoring is presented as a means of strengthening accountability and governance by creating spaces for those historically excluded to articulate concerns, influence decisions, and exercise control over resources. The process moves beyond an instrumental function of tracking outcomes, and instead operates as a political act that redistributes power and challenges hierarchical decision making structures. By involving communities in identifying issues, generating information, and taking collective action, monitoring becomes a site of learning and citizenship in practice. The paper ultimately positions social development monitoring as a process that not only ensures accountability but also enables communities to shape development pathways in ways that reflect their own priorities, knowledge, and autonomy.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Training on participatory research methodologies. September 18-22, 2017
    (2017-09-22) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Lived realities of women sanitation workers in india insights from a participatory research conducted in three cities of India
    (Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA), 2019-06) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Certificate in international perspectives in participatory research instructional guidelines
    (PRIA & UVic, 2013) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA); University of Victoria
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Workshop report teaching of participatory research, 4-5 August 2005
    (2005-08) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    From action research to knowledge democracy Cartagena 1977-2017
    (Colombian Journal of Sociology (RCS), 2018) Hall, Budd L; Tandon, Rajesh
    What can we learn from the histories of participatory research? In this article, Dr. Budd Hall and Dr. Rajesh Tandon reflect on the historical and political trajectories that shaped participatory action research in its current form. In conversation with pioneers such as Orlando Fals Borda, they situate participatory research within wider struggles for adult education, liberation and democratic knowledge production. Drawing from personal reflections and histories of adult education institutions, Hall and Tandon write about their own journeys into participatory research and the relationships that sustained these practices across continents. The article highlights the need for a non-fragmented methodology of action research, rooted in political praxis and committed to societal transformation. Through the work of Borda, particularly the landmark 1977 Cartagena conference that brought together over 4000 delegates to deliberate on people’s participation, the authors highlight the importance of challenging unequal relations of power and control. In revisiting these histories, the article affirms participatory action research as an ongoing project of epistemic justice and social transformation
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Paulo Freire and participatory action research
    (2018) Hall, Budd L
    How has Paulo Freire’s pedagogy shaped the theory and practice of Participatory Action Research? This article offers a reflective engagement with the life and work of Paulo Freire, tracing the connections between his political pedagogy and the emergence of Participatory Action Research. Beginning with Freire’s biography in Northeast Brazil and his formative experiences of poverty, faith and political struggle, the paper situates his educational philosophy within wider movements for social transformation. It draws parallels between Freire’s dialogical, critical and action oriented pedagogy and the work of scholars such as Orlando Fals Borda, who involved peasant communities directly in research processes, as well as Budd Hall’s early engagements in Tanzania during the period of Julius Nyerere. The article argues that Freire’s insistence on linking reflection with action and recognising all people as knowers profoundly influenced the epistemological foundations of Participatory Action Research. Ultimately, it presents Participatory Action Research as a disciplined process of personal and social transformation inspired by Freire’s enduring commitment to humanisation, dialogue and collective action.