Participatory Action Research

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://knowledgedemocracydspace.com/handle/123456789/1074

Browse

End date: 1979Subject: search.filters.subject.Global

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 10 of 11
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Participatory research handbook for community groups
    (International Council for Adult Education, 1978-06) Barndt, Deborah; Conchelos, Greg; Etherington, Alan; Galindo, June; Hall, Budd L; Harasim, Linda; Jackson, Ted; Marino, Dian; Tobias, Kathy; Vigoda, Al; Correia, Dianne; Icaza, Bernardita; Mansfield, Jennifer
    This handbook is about doing participatory research in local groups and communities, prepared in 1978 by the Participatory Research Project Group at the International Council for Adult Education. It is written for community groups without the money, professional training, or institutional support that usually make research an exclusive activity. Three ideas run through the book: participatory research is a method of social interaction built on full community involvement, an educational process that raises awareness of local problems, and a means of acting on what the research finds. Control over how information is gathered, analyzed, and used is meant to stay with the community throughout. A circular model called the research puzzle organizes the handbook's practical sections, moving groups through knowing their situation, identifying resources and issues, gathering and understanding information, acting, and reflecting. A sample profile index built around a housing cooperative and six case studies from Canadian communities, unions, and cooperatives ground these ideas in practice. The authors call it a first draft and invite readers to help shape what comes next.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Participatory research- An exploratory statement
    (0000) Tandon, Rajesh
    In this paper, Dr. Rajesh Tandon examines the limitations of conventional research that contributed to the emergence of Participatory Research. He identifies concerns such as the emphasis on objectivity, limited attention to the use of knowledge, the assumption that research is value-neutral, and the concentration of control over the research process and its outcomes in the hands of researchers. The paper distinguishes Participatory Research from academic, policy, and evaluation research by comparing who influences the selection of research problems, methods, and outcomes at different stages. It outlines an ideal participatory process based on shared decision-making, collaborative research design, and the joint collection and interpretation of data. Tandon also differentiates Participatory Research from Action Research by highlighting the researcher's explicit ideological position and the active involvement and control of participants throughout the inquiry. The paper concludes by identifying questions related to the validation of knowledge beyond conventional standards, the broader outcomes of participatory inquiry, and the political nature of research in social settings; presenting these as issues to be explored through participatory practice rather than resolved conceptually.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Participatory training: Philosophy and perspective
    (0000) Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA)
    The paper examines the assumptions underlying participatory training as a response to systems of inequality that concentrate power and control over the minds of ordinary people. Education, media and institutional knowledge production have historically devalued popular knowledge and eroded the self-confidence of ordinary people to think, act and transform their own realities. The paper proposes a set of guiding beliefs, termed articles of faith, centred on the capacity of ordinary people to learn, change and grow, as the basis for translating these ideas into practice. Conditions required for this translation include respecting learners and their experience, creating structured opportunities for sharing and critical reflection, strengthening self-esteem, and establishing mutuality between learner and trainer within a learner-centred and learner-controlled process. Training is presented as an ongoing, long-term intervention rather than an isolated event, directed toward generating new knowledge and countering hegemonic control. The paper closes by stating that trainers must first clarify their own assessment of reality, their vision of a better world, and their guiding articles of faith before designing training programmes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Breaking the monopoly of knowledge: research methods, participation and development
    (1977) Hall, Budd L
    Why do we undertake research, and in whose interests does it operate? In this essay, Dr. Budd Hall critically examines the dominant top down traditions of research in adult education and questions their claims to objectivity. He argues that conventional survey based approaches often extract information from communities while offering little in return. They produce knowledge that can be inaccurate, alienating, and detached from tangible social action. Engaging with radical educators and theorists such as Paulo Freire, Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss, Hall outlines the foundations of an alternative participatory research approach. This approach views knowledge as collectively produced and rooted in lived experience rather than imposed by external experts. Research, in this framing, becomes a process of dialogue, reflection, and action directed toward liberation and social transformation. The essay invites readers to reconsider the purpose of research itself and to imagine methodologies that expand human creative potential while challenging entrenched hierarchies of knowledge and power.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Participatory research: An alternative
    (0000)
    This paper by Dr. Rajesh Tandon examines the evolution of the knowledge industry and its impact on the interconnected domains of social science research and social development. He argues that the growing monopoly of knowledge production is controlled by professionals and experts who determine what constitutes ‘legitimate knowledge’ and ‘subjective opinion,’ which is built upon a top-down approach similar to the natural sciences. The paper identifies three salient features of social science research methodology that perpetuate this monopoly and thus require critical assessment. Subsequently, participatory research is presented as an alternative to conventional social science methodology. He traces the historical roots of participatory research and presents several characteristics that distinguish it from conventional inquiry. The chapter further compares the two research methodologies across three critical dimensions of problem definition, data collection and analysis, and utilization of results. It also presents some ambiguities about participatory research around its objectives, roles of researchers and participants, its methods, and its results. The paper concludes by emphasizing its link to contemporary social movements and the importance of strengthening them.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Participatory research
    (0000) Tandon, Rajesh
    This article by Dr. Rajesh Tandon examines the relationship between development with knowledge and research in the context of developing countries, arguing that mainstream development strategies have largely remained Western-centric, adopting a top-down, technology-driven approach and being detached from the lived realities of marginalized communities. He critiques post-WWII development strategies as primarily dependent on knowledge that is controlled by the monopoly of elite researchers to serve the interests of those in power- under the guise of objectivity and neutrality. The article further criticises the irrelevance of sophisticated research methodologies and ethical issues that arise due to seeing humans as mere subjects, and presents participatory research as an emerging alternative. It emphasises the role of ordinary people in generating and utilising their own knowledge to bring socio-economic changes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Issues and experiences in participatory research in Asia
    (1979-06-25) Tandon, Rajesh
    In this paper Dr. Rajesh Tandon examines characteristics and issues of participatory research as practised across Asia during the late 1970s, drawing on meetings held in India and Thailand alongside field reports from researchers. Practitioners engaging with participatory research bring varied motivations, ranging from disillusioned social scientists seeking relevance beyond classical research paradigms to activists redirecting failed development strategies toward decentralized alternatives and educators treating research itself as a vehicle for social transformation. Rural settings dominate the Asian experience, reflecting both the scale of rural populations and the concentration of documented efforts in land, health, and adult education. The paper situates participatory research in close and often uncomfortable relation to social action, tracing the political consequences that follow from this link across varied Asian contexts. It also addresses the largely unorganized condition of underprivileged groups and the corresponding need to build organization alongside inquiry, along with the personal values and behavioural skills researchers need to genuinely facilitate participation rather than reproduce authoritarian patterns. The paper closes by treating these issues as unresolved questions for the ongoing evolution of participatory research in the region, rather than settled conclusions.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Towards an epistemology of participatory research
    (Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA) , 0000) Chaudhary, Anil
    In this article, Dr. Anil Chaudhary examines the epistemological foundations of participatory research, arguing that its roots lie in the age-old traditions of knowledge production that have existed alongside the elite-controlled, formal knowledge frameworks throughout history. Drawing upon historical analysis, he demonstrates how control over knowledge production and utilisation has been an effective instrument of rule in all stratified societies. He divides them into three categories: structural control, linguistic control, and thematic control. The article thus talks about the parallel existence of two contrasting modes of knowledge production- the dominant mode and the popular mode. It presents participatory research as an attempt to refine the popular mode of knowledge in the contemporary context. Dr Chaudhary concludes the paper by suggesting some challenges for the future of participatory research.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Practical issues in the democratisation of research in non-formal education in the commonwealth
    (International Council for Adult Education, 1979) Hall, Budd L
    Dr. Budd L. Hall prepared this paper for the Commonwealth Specialist Conference on Non-Formal Education for Development, held in New Delhi in January and February 1979, while serving as Director of Research at the International Council for Adult Education. It looks at research trends of that period across the Commonwealth, moving through broad overviews, literacy studies, media evaluations, action research, and participatory research, before turning to what he treats as the most significant among them: the shift toward democratising research itself. Several developments point to this shift, among them research relocating from metropolitan countries toward the Third World, local researchers taking over roles once held by expatriates, and poor and exploited communities gaining a direct role in shaping the research process rather than remaining its subjects. Case examples from Botswana, Kenya, Tanzania, Canada, England, and India ground these claims. Practical questions follow how findings get communicated in accessible language, what alternative methods such as drawings, theatre, and song open for non-literate participants, how much longer democratic research takes, what it costs, and how local findings connect to larger structural issues. The paper ties democratic research to the wider struggle for social justice, with Hall insisting ordinary people hold both the ability and the right to interpret their own problems.