Browsing by Author "ASSWI"

Filter results by typing the first few letters
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Inter-Professional Dialogue on Participatory Research and Participatory Developmet
    (PRIA and ASSWI, 1995-04-19) PRIA; ASSWI
    Inter-Professional Dialogue on Participatory Research and Development, 19-25 April, 1995 was organised by the Society for Participatory Research in Asia (PRIA) in collaboration with the Association of Schools of Social Work in India (ASSWI) on the premises of PRIA. This six-day programme was intended to orient the social work educators on people-centred, people-controlled development in India (and elsewhere) and Participatory Research through dialogical methods across professions. The dialogue was designed intra professionally. i.e. within the social work educators, and inter-professionally, i.e. between the educators and practitioners. The focus was not only to exchange learning but also to examine the implications of people-centred development and participatory research for social work education in India. (For detail of the programme design)
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Second Regional Inter-Professional Dialogue on PD and PR for Social Work Education in Western Region
    (1997-07-07) PRIA; MASWE; ASSWI
    After the 2nd world war, new independent colonies were waging a lone battle to overcome the destruction caused by the war. It was then that the need was felt for economic development. This resulted in working out increased goods and services and altering distribution systems. Western countries wanted capital for reconstruction while the poor countries wanted socio-economic transformation. Various schools of thought came forward. For Eg. in Rosto approach (non-communist manifesto) growth can take place with minimum Govt. Intervention and benefits will percolate to the lowest rung. On the Indian scenario one witnessed a mixed economy. We were not in favour of absolutely centralised planning, neither were we in favour of too much govt. intervention so we adopted the mid way. During the III plan India had taken 28% foreign aid so the plea was for self reliance. What we need should be produced in our country was the demand. Trade is better than aid was the catch word i.e. for what we take from outside we shall pay for it. Our economy was mixed i.e. centralised planning in some areas and no govt. intervention or capital in others. During emergency we went in for free economy. By 1985 we faced a down hill trend and in 1991 the trend was open economy. Now we are back to capitalist economy. Capital economy has its demerits i.e. pollution, neglect of agriculture, unbalanced regional growth, increase in cash crops etc.